M/S ANIL AND COMPANY vs PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD — ARB/162/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010565742026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

ARB/19968/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

ARB/162/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

Bench Type

Single

Category

69.4 - ARBITRATION U/S 11 (LESS THAN 5 CRORE) ( 938 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S ANIL AND COMPANY

    Adv. PRABHINDER SINGH PUNIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh PuriView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed M/S Anil and Company's petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Dr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate, as the independent Sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute. The petitioner sought court appointment after invoking the arbitration clause (Clause 25) in their contract with Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation Ltd., arguing that the respondent's nominated arbitrator was unilateral; the respondent subsequently consented to an independent arbitrator's appointment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARB/162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed M/S Anil and Company's petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Dr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate, as the independent Sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute. The petitioner sought court appointment after invoking the arbitration clause (Clause 25) in their contract with Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation Ltd., arguing that the respondent's nominated arbitrator was unilateral; the respondent subsequently consented to an independent arbitrator's appointment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case