SOMBIR vs VIKRAM AND OTHERS — FAO/2921/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010564092022

Filing Number

FAO/22530/2022

Filing Date

23-May-2022

Registration No

FAO/2921/2022

Registration Date

01-Jul-2022

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.21 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 886 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOMBIR

    Adv. SUMIT SANGWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SUNIL KUMAR

  3. 3.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO/2921/2022 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Sombir's appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award, enhancing compensation from Rs. 1,52,839 to Rs. 3,02,839 (original amount plus Rs. 1,50,000 lump-sum enhancement) for injuries sustained in a 2018 motor vehicle accident. The court found the tribunal's award inadequate given the claimant's severe injuries (multiple fractures, chest injuries, eye injury, liver contusion) and prolonged hospitalization, awarding additional compensation for pain and suffering. The court granted 9% per annum interest on the enhanced amount from the claim petition date until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/2921/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO/2921/2022 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Sombir's appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award, enhancing compensation from Rs. 1,52,839 to Rs. 3,02,839 (original amount plus Rs. 1,50,000 lump-sum enhancement) for injuries sustained in a 2018 motor vehicle accident. The court found the tribunal's award inadequate given the claimant's severe injuries (multiple fractures, chest injuries, eye injury, liver contusion) and prolonged hospitalization, awarding additional compensation for pain and suffering. The court granted 9% per annum interest on the enhanced amount from the claim petition date until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case