AJAY SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/19008/2026

Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

CNR: PHHC010564022026

Filing Number

CRM-M/25064/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/19008/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.13 - QUASHING PETITIONS (AGNST WOMEN) ( 284 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY SINGH

    Adv. MUNISH GULATI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    Justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/19008/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Ajay Singh's petition to quash the proclaimed person order dated 06.12.2025. The court found that Singh's prolonged absence from trial proceedings was satisfactorily explained by his need to care for his pregnant sister whose husband was in custody; the main accused had already been acquitted on 09.01.2026. The court quashed the order subject to Singh paying Rs. 50,000 as costs to an Old Age Home and directed him to appear before the trial court within two weeks to obtain bail, with two weeks' protection from arrest granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19008/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/19008/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Ajay Singh's petition to quash the proclaimed person order dated 06.12.2025. The court found that Singh's prolonged absence from trial proceedings was satisfactorily explained by his need to care for his pregnant sister whose husband was in custody; the main accused had already been acquitted on 09.01.2026. The court quashed the order subject to Singh paying Rs. 50,000 as costs to an Old Age Home and directed him to appear before the trial court within two weeks to obtain bail, with two weeks' protection from arrest granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case