M/S SHANKAR TWINEPRODUCT PVT. LTD vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/10355/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010563252026
e-Filing Number
02-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/19910/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/10355/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.64 - ELECT. DIS REG THEFT, DEFECTIVE METRE,OVERCHARGING ( 757 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SHANKAR TWINEPRODUCT PVT. LTD
Adv. SURENDER DHULL
-
2.Shankar Twine
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
-
2.Shankar Twine
-
3.Dakshin
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by restraining the State of Haryana from taking coercive action against Shankar Twine Product Pvt. Ltd. regarding alleged electricity theft demands, since the petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case and no liability was established. The court prohibited electricity supply withholding and further demands, permitting the respondent only to approach the Special Judge under Section 154(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 if it wishes to pursue the matter further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/10355/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by restraining the State of Haryana from taking coercive action against Shankar Twine Product Pvt. Ltd. regarding alleged electricity theft demands, since the petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case and no liability was established. The court prohibited electricity supply withholding and further demands, permitting the respondent only to approach the Special Judge under Section 154(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 if it wishes to pursue the matter further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts