RAKESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18480/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010560402026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24980/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18480/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KUMAR

    Adv. AMIT SHARMA

  2. 2.RAKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.RAKESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Rakesh Kumar in an NDPS drug trafficking case. Although the petitioner was nominated based on a co-accused's disclosure statement (which lacks independent corroboration under *Tofan Singh* precedent), the court found that no recovery was made from him, he had been in custody since November 2025, and the trial would take considerable time. The court ordered his release on personal/surety bonds with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, appearance before the trial court, and keeping his mobile phone accessible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18480/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Rakesh Kumar in an NDPS drug trafficking case. Although the petitioner was nominated based on a co-accused's disclosure statement (which lacks independent corroboration under *Tofan Singh* precedent), the court found that no recovery was made from him, he had been in custody since November 2025, and the trial would take considerable time. The court ordered his release on personal/surety bonds with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, appearance before the trial court, and keeping his mobile phone accessible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case