RAM KISHAN vs UHBVNL AND ORS. Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA — CWP/9351/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-May-2023

CNR: PHHC010559572023

Filing Number

CWP/22441/2023

Filing Date

28-Apr-2023

Registration No

CWP/9351/2023

Registration Date

29-Apr-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.12 - SCOSB (HARYANA) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 454 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM KISHAN

    Adv. ROHIT MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UHBVNL AND ORS. Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA

  2. 2.CHIEF ENGINEER

  3. 3.SUPDT ENGINEER

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-9351-2023 Ram Kishan filed a writ petition challenging an order by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, seeking to set aside an allegedly illegal decision and requesting his pension be recalculated as a regular employee rather than on daily-wage basis. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition on May 11, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel stated he had instructions to withdraw the case and did not wish to proceed further, without the court expressing any opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2023

    Other

  4. 28-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9351/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-9351-2023 Ram Kishan filed a writ petition challenging an order by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, seeking to set aside an allegedly illegal decision and requesting his pension be recalculated as a regular employee rather than on daily-wage basis. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition on May 11, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel stated he had instructions to withdraw the case and did not wish to proceed further, without the court expressing any opinion on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case