ISHAV BHARDWAJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18451/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010558892026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24894/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18451/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHAV BHARDWAJ

    Adv. NARINDER LUCKY

  2. 2.ISHAV BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Ishav Bhardwaj, who had been in custody for 2 months and 30 days in a theft case where he was allegedly involved based on co-accused statements. The court held that further incarceration would violate Article 21 rights, considering the challan was presented but charges remain unframed with 21 prosecution witnesses, and the petitioner has no other pending cases. The bail was granted subject to standard conditions including furnishing surety bonds, appearing before trial court, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the country without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18451/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Ishav Bhardwaj, who had been in custody for 2 months and 30 days in a theft case where he was allegedly involved based on co-accused statements. The court held that further incarceration would violate Article 21 rights, considering the challan was presented but charges remain unframed with 21 prosecution witnesses, and the petitioner has no other pending cases. The bail was granted subject to standard conditions including furnishing surety bonds, appearing before trial court, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the country without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case