BABALJEET SINGH KINGRA vs NATHA SINGH BHULLAR — COCP/1543/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010558862026

Filing Number

COCP/19657/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

COCP/1543/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABALJEET SINGH KINGRA

    Adv. SAVREET SINGH BRAR

  2. 2.BABALJEET SINGH KINGRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATHA SINGH BHULLAR

  2. 2.BABALJEET SINGH KINGRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/1543/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the contempt petition filed by Babaljeet Singh Kingra against Natha Singh Bhullar, finding that the respondent had complied with the Court's February 24, 2026 order directing him to decide the petitioner's representation dated October 24, 2025. The respondent produced a compliance affidavit with a speaking order dated May 7, 2026, which satisfied the court's directive, thereby purging the contempt. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the May 7, 2026 order through available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/1543/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/1543/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the contempt petition filed by Babaljeet Singh Kingra against Natha Singh Bhullar, finding that the respondent had complied with the Court's February 24, 2026 order directing him to decide the petitioner's representation dated October 24, 2025. The respondent produced a compliance affidavit with a speaking order dated May 7, 2026, which satisfied the court's directive, thereby purging the contempt. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the May 7, 2026 order through available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case