DINESH GARG vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/9848/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2025

CNR: PHHC010558352025

e-Filing Number

04-04-2025

Filing Number

CWP/21548/2025

Filing Date

04-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWP/9848/2025

Registration Date

04-Apr-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.7 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SECONDARY) ( 730 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH GARG

    Adv. ANKUR SIDHAR

  2. 2.Dinesh Garg

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

  2. 2.Dinesh Garg

  3. 3.Department of Elementary Education

  4. 4.Haryana Staff Selection Commission

  5. 5.Vinay Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Summary of CWP-9848-2025: Dinesh Garg v. State of Haryana The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Dinesh Garg's petition challenging rejection of his candidature for TGT English on age grounds. The court held that Garg, who had 16+ years of teaching experience as Master (Mathematics) in government schools, was entitled to age relaxation under clause 8(I)(ix) of the recruitment rules, which requires only "equivalent post" experience, not subject-specific experience. The court also rejected the state's argument that marking "NA" in the age relaxation column constituted non-claiming of relaxation, holding this was permissible since he had never previously availed such relaxation and had submitted proper experience certificates. The court directed appointment within four weeks with notional benefits from other selected candidates' appointment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9848/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-9848-2025: Dinesh Garg v. State of Haryana The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Dinesh Garg's petition challenging rejection of his candidature for TGT English on age grounds. The court held that Garg, who had 16+ years of teaching experience as Master (Mathematics) in government schools, was entitled to age relaxation under clause 8(I)(ix) of the recruitment rules, which requires only "equivalent post" experience, not subject-specific experience. The court also rejected the state's argument that marking "NA" in the age relaxation column constituted non-claiming of relaxation, holding this was permissible since he had never previously availed such relaxation and had submitted proper experience certificates. The court directed appointment within four weeks with notional benefits from other selected candidates' appointment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case