SMT MALTI BHARGAV vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/19542/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010558062026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24859/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/19542/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Category

38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT MALTI BHARGAV

    Adv. ROHIT MITTAL

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.VIKRAM SINGH YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the bail cancellation order against Smt. Malti Bhargav, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court granted her one final opportunity to appear before the trial court, considering her consistent prior attendance and that her absence on 27.10.2025 was due to illness rather than deliberate default. The petitioner must furnish fresh bail bonds, submit an undertaking to appear regularly, and pay Rs. 10,000 as costs to an Old Age Home within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19542/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the bail cancellation order against Smt. Malti Bhargav, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court granted her one final opportunity to appear before the trial court, considering her consistent prior attendance and that her absence on 27.10.2025 was due to illness rather than deliberate default. The petitioner must furnish fresh bail bonds, submit an undertaking to appear regularly, and pay Rs. 10,000 as costs to an Old Age Home within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case