PARGAN SINGH vs LIFE INSURANCE CORP. & OTHERS — RSA/653/2001

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Aug-2012

CNR: PHHC010556582001

Filing Number

RSA/653/2001

Filing Date

22-Feb-2001

Registration No

RSA/653/2001

Registration Date

22-Feb-2001

Judge

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARGAN SINGH

    Adv. C.L. SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LIFE INSURANCE CORP. & OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/653/2001 Pargan Singh v. Life Insurance Corporation of India The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pargan Singh's second appeal challenging LIC's repudiation of his wife's life insurance claim. The court upheld lower court findings that the insured had concealed material facts—she suffered from Hodgkin's Lymphoma and chronic fever before obtaining the policy but falsely declared herself in good health. Additionally, Singh had accepted ₹15,434 as ex gratia settlement, thereby executing a full discharge of LIC's liabilities, which estopped him from subsequently challenging the repudiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Sep-2012

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  4. 21-Sep-2012

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  5. 27-Aug-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Feb-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/653/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/653/2001 Pargan Singh v. Life Insurance Corporation of India The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pargan Singh's second appeal challenging LIC's repudiation of his wife's life insurance claim. The court upheld lower court findings that the insured had concealed material facts—she suffered from Hodgkin's Lymphoma and chronic fever before obtaining the policy but falsely declared herself in good health. Additionally, Singh had accepted ₹15,434 as ex gratia settlement, thereby executing a full discharge of LIC's liabilities, which estopped him from subsequently challenging the repudiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case