GYANI JAIL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18257/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010554742026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24694/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18257/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GYANI JAIL SINGH

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Gyani Jail Singh, arrested for possessing 70 kg of poppy husk (a commercial quantity under NDPS Act), based on his prolonged incarceration for over 1 year 6 months with slow trial progress (only 6 of 16 prosecution witnesses examined) and clean antecedents. The court held that constitutional rights to speedy trial under Article 21 override Section 37 NDPS restrictions when accused faces undue delay, subject to standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-departure from India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18257/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Gyani Jail Singh, arrested for possessing 70 kg of poppy husk (a commercial quantity under NDPS Act), based on his prolonged incarceration for over 1 year 6 months with slow trial progress (only 6 of 16 prosecution witnesses examined) and clean antecedents. The court held that constitutional rights to speedy trial under Article 21 override Section 37 NDPS restrictions when accused faces undue delay, subject to standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-departure from India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case