UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs DEFENCE ACCOUNTS PENSIONERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REGD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT — CWP/10996/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

CNR: PHHC010554682026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

31-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/19504/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

CWP/10996/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Category

4.8 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ( 364 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Administrative Tribunals (Amendment) Act

Petitioner(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Adv. Rohit Verma

Union of India and Others

Sh R L Sharma

Respondent(s)

DEFENCE ACCOUNTS PENSIONERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REGD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

Union of India and Others

Sh R L Sharma

The Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench through its Registrar

Orders

10-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel acknowledged that a subsequent Madras High Court judgment had decided the legal issue in favour of the Department, but this judgment was not brought to the Tribunal's notice when it allowed the respondents' claims. The court granted liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel acknowledged that a subsequent Madras High Court judgment had decided the legal issue in favour of the Department, but this judgment was not brought to the Tribunal's notice when it allowed the respondents' claims. The court granted liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case