UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs DEFENCE ACCOUNTS PENSIONERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REGD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT — CWP/10996/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010554682026

e-Filing Number

31-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/19504/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/10996/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Category

4.8 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ( 364 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Administrative Tribunals (Amendment) Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Adv. Rohit Verma

  2. 2.Union of India and Others

  3. 3.Sh R L Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEFENCE ACCOUNTS PENSIONERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REGD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

  2. 2.Union of India and Others

  3. 3.Sh R L Sharma

  4. 4.The Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench through its Registrar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel acknowledged that a subsequent Madras High Court judgment had decided the legal issue in favour of the Department, but this judgment was not brought to the Tribunal's notice when it allowed the respondents' claims. The court granted liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/10996/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel acknowledged that a subsequent Madras High Court judgment had decided the legal issue in favour of the Department, but this judgment was not brought to the Tribunal's notice when it allowed the respondents' claims. The court granted liberty to file a review petition before the Tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case