PRINCE vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18227/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010553942026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24628/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18227/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE

    Adv. SHIVAM VASHISHT

  2. 2.PRINCE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted interim regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS drug case involving alleged recovery of 40 grams of intoxicant powder and Rs. 3 lakhs. The court found that since the chemical examiner report had not yet been received despite the petitioner's arrest on 18.2.2026, bail should be granted pending the report's submission, relying on precedent that delay in FSL testing prejudices the accused. The court imposed strict conditions including non-tampering with evidence, monthly affidavits confirming no further offences, and restrictions on movement, while noting that a fresh bail application could be filed after the chemical report's presentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted interim regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS drug case involving alleged recovery of 40 grams of intoxicant powder and Rs. 3 lakhs. The court found that since the chemical examiner report had not yet been received despite the petitioner's arrest on 18.2.2026, bail should be granted pending the report's submission, relying on precedent that delay in FSL testing prejudices the accused. The court imposed strict conditions including non-tampering with evidence, monthly affidavits confirming no further offences, and restrictions on movement, while noting that a fresh bail application could be filed after the chemical report's presentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case