RAJVINDER SINGH ALIAS SINKU AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/20215/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010552692026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24546/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20215/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJVINDER SINGH ALIAS SINKU AND ANR

    Adv. RAHUL KADIAN

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/20215/2026 The High Court for Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 1339 (dated 22.12.2023) under IPC Sections 307, 323, 506, 34 registered against Rajvinder Singh @ Sinku and another at Police Station Sadar Hisar, based on amicable settlement between the parties. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj held that continuation of criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of court process where parties have voluntarily settled their dispute without coercion, and that quashing the FIR secured the ends of justice in accordance with Supreme Court precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/20215/2026 The High Court for Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 1339 (dated 22.12.2023) under IPC Sections 307, 323, 506, 34 registered against Rajvinder Singh @ Sinku and another at Police Station Sadar Hisar, based on amicable settlement between the parties. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj held that continuation of criminal proceedings would constitute abuse of court process where parties have voluntarily settled their dispute without coercion, and that quashing the FIR secured the ends of justice in accordance with Supreme Court precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case