ARSHDEEP SINGH @ ARSHI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18194/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010550462026
Filing Number
CRM-M/24486/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/18194/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARSHDEEP SINGH @ ARSHI
Adv. Sumit Dua
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF
Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Arshdeep Singh in a theft case (FIR under IPC Section 379-B) involving an alleged bus snatching of Rs. 20,000. The court found that the FIR named unknown persons with no clear evidence identifying the petitioner, and since only 2 of 12 prosecution witnesses had been examined, the trial would take considerable time. Although the petitioner had previously misused bail by absconding, the court deemed bail appropriate pending trial conclusion, ordering release upon furnishing bail bonds within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/18194/2026
Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Arshdeep Singh in a theft case (FIR under IPC Section 379-B) involving an alleged bus snatching of Rs. 20,000. The court found that the FIR named unknown persons with no clear evidence identifying the petitioner, and since only 2 of 12 prosecution witnesses had been examined, the trial would take considerable time. Although the petitioner had previously misused bail by absconding, the court deemed bail appropriate pending trial conclusion, ordering release upon furnishing bail bonds within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts