JUDGEBIR SINGH @ JUDGE vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18230/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010549062026

Filing Number

CRM-M/24296/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18230/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUDGEBIR SINGH @ JUDGE

    Adv. RISHU MAHAJAN

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving 544 grams of heroin, finding that despite the serious nature of the charges under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the rigors of that section were satisfied given the petitioner's 5+ months incarceration, clean record, and absence of flight risk. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including monthly affidavits, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on movement while noting that questions regarding the petitioner's culpability regarding the contraband would be determined at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving 544 grams of heroin, finding that despite the serious nature of the charges under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the rigors of that section were satisfied given the petitioner's 5+ months incarceration, clean record, and absence of flight risk. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including monthly affidavits, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on movement while noting that questions regarding the petitioner's culpability regarding the contraband would be determined at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case