PB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Y.P.KHULLAR vs S.S.RAIZADA EXECUTIVE ENGINEE — RSA/3760/2001

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Jan-2005

CNR: PHHC010540932001

Filing Number

RSA/3760/2001

Filing Date

14-Sep-2001

Registration No

RSA/3760/2001

Registration Date

14-Sep-2001

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

77.5 - EXECUTION PETITION (COMMERCIAL) ( 253 )

Sub-Category

( 253 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Y.P.KHULLAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.S.RAIZADA EXECUTIVE ENGINEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal as infructuous after the respondent, an Executive Engineer with Punjab State Electricity Board, expired on 26.02.2011. The respondent's wife submitted an affidavit consenting to a 5% pension cut and confirming that Rs. 47,884 in recoverable dues had already been recovered, stating she would not pursue the appeal. The court accepted these submissions and dismissed the case along with pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-May-2005

    —

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta

  4. 18-Jan-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-Sep-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3760/2001

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal as infructuous after the respondent, an Executive Engineer with Punjab State Electricity Board, expired on 26.02.2011. The respondent's wife submitted an affidavit consenting to a 5% pension cut and confirming that Rs. 47,884 in recoverable dues had already been recovered, stating she would not pursue the appeal. The court accepted these submissions and dismissed the case along with pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case