NITIN GARG AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/18746/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010538552026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23824/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18746/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.23 - QUASHING COMROMISE U/S 482 CRPC CRIME AGST WOMEN ( 643 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN GARG AND OTHERS

    Adv. KUNAL VINAYAK

  2. 2.NITIN GARG

  3. 3.NARENDER PARKASH GARG

  4. 4.SHASHI GARG

  5. 5.NEHA GARG

  6. 6.NAROTAM KUMAR

  7. 7.SATISH GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.NITIN GARG

  3. 3.NARENDER PARKASH GARG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Alok JainView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 279 (May 2023) against the petitioners after finding that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute without coercion or undue influence. The court exercised its Section 528 BNSS power, finding that continuing criminal proceedings in civil-natured cases where parties have bona fide compromised would be futile. Costs of Rs. 50,000 each were imposed on the petitioners and respondent No. 2, payable within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18746/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 279 (May 2023) against the petitioners after finding that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute without coercion or undue influence. The court exercised its Section 528 BNSS power, finding that continuing criminal proceedings in civil-natured cases where parties have bona fide compromised would be futile. Costs of Rs. 50,000 each were imposed on the petitioners and respondent No. 2, payable within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case