VIVEK @ ABHISHEK @ BAIKU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18279/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010536722026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23750/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18279/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK @ ABHISHEK @ BAIKU

    Adv. ANURAG

  2. 2.VIVEK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.VIVEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted bail to Vivek (accused of illegal weapons possession and criminal syndicate involvement) in this second bail petition, holding that his five-month-plus custody was unjustifiable given investigation completion, co-accused's bail grant, absence of evidence linking him to the crime syndicate, and likelihood of trial delay. The court emphasized that bail is the rule, not exception, and prolonged pre-trial detention without conviction constitutes grave injustice under constitutional Article 21 protections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted bail to Vivek (accused of illegal weapons possession and criminal syndicate involvement) in this second bail petition, holding that his five-month-plus custody was unjustifiable given investigation completion, co-accused's bail grant, absence of evidence linking him to the crime syndicate, and likelihood of trial delay. The court emphasized that bail is the rule, not exception, and prolonged pre-trial detention without conviction constitutes grave injustice under constitutional Article 21 protections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case