AMIT ALIAS AMIT KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18330/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010535442026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23669/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18330/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT ALIAS AMIT KUMAR

    Adv. PRADEEP CHHOKER

  2. 2.AMIT @ AMIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.AMIT @ AMIT KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Amit Kumar, arrested in July 2024 for possession of 34 kg of ganja under the NDPS Act, after he spent 1 year, 8 months, and 17 days in custody with trial unlikely to conclude soon (only 0 of 23 prosecution witnesses examined). The court held that prolonged incarceration is ground for bail even in NDPS cases, citing Supreme Court precedent that constitutional rights under Article 21 override Section 37 statutory restrictions when detention becomes excessive, and that bail should be released subject to standard conditions including bond furnishing and trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18330/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Amit Kumar, arrested in July 2024 for possession of 34 kg of ganja under the NDPS Act, after he spent 1 year, 8 months, and 17 days in custody with trial unlikely to conclude soon (only 0 of 23 prosecution witnesses examined). The court held that prolonged incarceration is ground for bail even in NDPS cases, citing Supreme Court precedent that constitutional rights under Article 21 override Section 37 statutory restrictions when detention becomes excessive, and that bail should be released subject to standard conditions including bond furnishing and trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case