SURINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. — CRM-M/18042/2026

Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010535232026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23626/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18042/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER SINGH

    Adv. K.B.S. MANN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/18042/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Surinder Singh's petition to quash FIR No.174 dated 01.12.2025 (registered under Sections 118(1), 115(2) BNS at PS Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib) and all consequential proceedings. The court found that the parties had voluntarily reached a compromise dated 11.03.2026 without coercion or undue influence, as confirmed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate's report dated 12.05.2026. With both the State and respondents not disputing the compromise, the court held that continuing proceedings served no useful purpose and quashed the FIR accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18042/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/18042/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Surinder Singh's petition to quash FIR No.174 dated 01.12.2025 (registered under Sections 118(1), 115(2) BNS at PS Gidderbaha, District Sri Muktsar Sahib) and all consequential proceedings. The court found that the parties had voluntarily reached a compromise dated 11.03.2026 without coercion or undue influence, as confirmed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate's report dated 12.05.2026. With both the State and respondents not disputing the compromise, the court held that continuing proceedings served no useful purpose and quashed the FIR accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case