ASHWANI KUMAR @ MONU SHARMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/18568/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010534062026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23550/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18568/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWANI KUMAR @ MONU SHARMA

    Adv. JAGPAL SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.BHUTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/18568/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Ashwani Kumar's petition to quash FIR No. 0024 (Section 420 IPC) registered at Police Station Dhariwal, Gurdaspur, finding that a genuine compromise was reached between the petitioner and complainant on 10.11.2025. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, and both State counsel and complainant's counsel did not dispute it. Applying settled principles, the court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and quashed the FIR with all subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18568/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/18568/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Ashwani Kumar's petition to quash FIR No. 0024 (Section 420 IPC) registered at Police Station Dhariwal, Gurdaspur, finding that a genuine compromise was reached between the petitioner and complainant on 10.11.2025. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, and both State counsel and complainant's counsel did not dispute it. Applying settled principles, the court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and quashed the FIR with all subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case