JAGSIR SINGH ALIAS GIANI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18195/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010531212026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23390/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18195/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGSIR SINGH ALIAS GIANI

    Adv. KIRAT PAL DHALIWAL

  2. 2.JAGSIR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.JAGSIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Jagsir Singh in a narcotic drugs case involving 30 grams of heroin (non-commercial quantity) under NDPS Act Sections 21 & 29. The court emphasized the constitutional right to speedy trial, noting that despite the petitioner's involvement in 35 other cases (with 29 acquittals), prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21. The court directed release on furnishing bail bonds, finding the recovery fell outside Section 37's mandatory provisions and that trial completion would take considerable time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Jagsir Singh in a narcotic drugs case involving 30 grams of heroin (non-commercial quantity) under NDPS Act Sections 21 & 29. The court emphasized the constitutional right to speedy trial, noting that despite the petitioner's involvement in 35 other cases (with 29 acquittals), prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21. The court directed release on furnishing bail bonds, finding the recovery fell outside Section 37's mandatory provisions and that trial completion would take considerable time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case