KARANPREET SINGH ALIAS KARANBEER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/17394/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010528592026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23262/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/17394/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARANPREET SINGH ALIAS KARANBEER SINGH

    Adv. Randeep Singh

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/17394/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to both Karanpreet Singh and Lovepreet Singh, who were arrested for illegal firearms possession and gang-related charges under BNS Sections 111, 111(2), 111(3), and the Arms Act. The court found that while the charges are serious, the petitioners qualified for bail as first-time offenders who had been in custody for several months without any prosecution witnesses being examined, making a speedy trial unlikely. The court imposed conditions including monthly police station appearances, Rs. 1,00,000 fixed deposits each, and undertakings regarding non-involvement in other crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/17394/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/17394/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to both Karanpreet Singh and Lovepreet Singh, who were arrested for illegal firearms possession and gang-related charges under BNS Sections 111, 111(2), 111(3), and the Arms Act. The court found that while the charges are serious, the petitioners qualified for bail as first-time offenders who had been in custody for several months without any prosecution witnesses being examined, making a speedy trial unlikely. The court imposed conditions including monthly police station appearances, Rs. 1,00,000 fixed deposits each, and undertakings regarding non-involvement in other crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case