JITENDER vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18162/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010528562026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23213/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18162/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDER

    Adv. RAHUL DESWAL

  2. 2.JITENDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner Jitender in a murder case (FIR No. 579/2022) under Section 483 BNS. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for over 3 years and 5 months, the complainant (deceased's sister) turned hostile, the co-accused was already granted bail, and only 7 out of 36 prosecution witnesses had been examined with trial conclusion likely years away. The court held that continued detention would amount to punishment without trial, relying on Supreme Court precedent, and ordered release on furnishing bail and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner Jitender in a murder case (FIR No. 579/2022) under Section 483 BNS. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for over 3 years and 5 months, the complainant (deceased's sister) turned hostile, the co-accused was already granted bail, and only 7 out of 36 prosecution witnesses had been examined with trial conclusion likely years away. The court held that continued detention would amount to punishment without trial, relying on Supreme Court precedent, and ordered release on furnishing bail and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case