SUNRISE UNIVERSITY vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/18360/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010528242026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23239/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18360/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNRISE UNIVERSITY

    Adv. SAHIL GOEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/18360/2026 Sunrise University petitioned to quash a re-investigation order dated 14.02.2020 in FIR No.183 (registered under IPC Sections 120-B, 406, 420), arguing that a prior court order directing examination of territorial jurisdiction was not complied with and that no concrete evidence existed within Police Station Adampur's jurisdiction. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rejected the petition but did not quash the FIR, instead directing the investigating officer to expeditiously conclude the investigation within two months, acknowledging alleged malpractices at the university required proper investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/18360/2026 Sunrise University petitioned to quash a re-investigation order dated 14.02.2020 in FIR No.183 (registered under IPC Sections 120-B, 406, 420), arguing that a prior court order directing examination of territorial jurisdiction was not complied with and that no concrete evidence existed within Police Station Adampur's jurisdiction. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rejected the petition but did not quash the FIR, instead directing the investigating officer to expeditiously conclude the investigation within two months, acknowledging alleged malpractices at the university required proper investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case