ARSHDEEP SINGH @ KAKA SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/18174/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010528182026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23238/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/18174/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARSHDEEP SINGH @ KAKA SINGH

    Adv. ADISH JAIN

  2. 2.ARSHDEEP SINGH @ KAKA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.ARSHDEEP SINGH @ KAKA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Arshdeep Singh, who had been in custody for over 5 months in connection with FIR No.435 involving serious charges including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found that with 21 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined, trial conclusion would take considerable time, and there was no evidence suggesting risk of absconding or witness tampering, making continued custody unjustifiable despite the severity of allegations. The bail was granted subject to strict conditions including non-interference with evidence, regular court appearance, and passport deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Arshdeep Singh, who had been in custody for over 5 months in connection with FIR No.435 involving serious charges including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found that with 21 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined, trial conclusion would take considerable time, and there was no evidence suggesting risk of absconding or witness tampering, making continued custody unjustifiable despite the severity of allegations. The bail was granted subject to strict conditions including non-interference with evidence, regular court appearance, and passport deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case