VISHNU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/17423/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010528102026

Filing Number

CRM-M/23266/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/17423/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU

    Adv. L M GULATI

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-17423-2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Vishnu, a 22-year-old accused in FIR 261 for offences under BNS sections 351(3), 351(2), 3(5), 118(1), 115, and 109(1). The court found that Vishnu was falsely implicated merely for being related to co-accused Alok, with his name appearing only five months after the incident in another co-accused's disclosure statement without any specific role assigned. Since Vishnu complied with investigation requirements and no custodial interrogation was needed, the court made the interim bail absolute, imposing conditions including continued cooperation with investigation and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/17423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-17423-2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Vishnu, a 22-year-old accused in FIR 261 for offences under BNS sections 351(3), 351(2), 3(5), 118(1), 115, and 109(1). The court found that Vishnu was falsely implicated merely for being related to co-accused Alok, with his name appearing only five months after the incident in another co-accused's disclosure statement without any specific role assigned. Since Vishnu complied with investigation requirements and no custodial interrogation was needed, the court made the interim bail absolute, imposing conditions including continued cooperation with investigation and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case