ARPIT JAIN AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR — CRM-M/17482/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010525082026
Filing Number
CRM-M/23058/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/17482/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARPIT JAIN AND ANR
Adv. KAMAL DEEP SINGH SIDHU
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
-
3.BRIJESH KUMAR SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.18 (2019) involving charges under Sections 387, 452, 504, 506, 509, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise deed dated 07.03.2026 between petitioners Arpit Jain and respondent. The court found that the offense was personal/private in nature, non-serious, without criminal history, and that quashing served the ends of justice as the victim willingly consented to settlement without coercion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/17482/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.18 (2019) involving charges under Sections 387, 452, 504, 506, 509, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise deed dated 07.03.2026 between petitioners Arpit Jain and respondent. The court found that the offense was personal/private in nature, non-serious, without criminal history, and that quashing served the ends of justice as the victim willingly consented to settlement without coercion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts