BHAVYA GARG vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18027/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010519962025

Filing Number

CRM-M/27235/2025

Filing Date

29-Mar-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/18027/2025

Registration Date

29-Mar-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Coram

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39.13 - ANTICIPATORY BAIL (AGNST WOMEN) ( 285 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVYA GARG

    Adv. RAMNEEK VASUDEVA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Kirti SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-18027/2025 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted Bhavya Garg's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in FIR No. 716 (Sections 108 and 3(5 BNS) registered at City Ballabhgarh Police Station, after the petitioner complied with investigation directions and was found not required for further investigation. The court made the previous order absolute with conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, clarifying the protection applies only to this specific FIR and reserving liberty for the investigating agency to seek revocation upon violation of terms or sufficient cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/18027/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-18027/2025 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted Bhavya Garg's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in FIR No. 716 (Sections 108 and 3(5 BNS) registered at City Ballabhgarh Police Station, after the petitioner complied with investigation directions and was found not required for further investigation. The court made the previous order absolute with conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, clarifying the protection applies only to this specific FIR and reserving liberty for the investigating agency to seek revocation upon violation of terms or sufficient cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case