M S GANPATI HANDLOOM AND ENTERPRISES KARTIKEY CHOPRA vs AXIS BANK LTD AND ANOTHER — CWP/9616/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010515852026

e-Filing Number

25-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/18070/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/9616/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M S GANPATI HANDLOOM AND ENTERPRISES KARTIKEY CHOPRA

  2. 2.M s Ganpati Handloom and Enterprises

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK LTD AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.M s Ganpati Handloom and Enterprises

  3. 3.Axis Bank Ltd through its Managing Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed Axis Bank to defreeze M/S Ganpati Handloom and Enterprises' account upon the petitioner providing clarification on the source of funds and details of at least 20% of recipient accounts/persons for the crore-rupee transfers made within one month. The court rejected the bank's demand for invoices while accommodating its fraud-prevention concerns through a balanced disclosure requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9616/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed Axis Bank to defreeze M/S Ganpati Handloom and Enterprises' account upon the petitioner providing clarification on the source of funds and details of at least 20% of recipient accounts/persons for the crore-rupee transfers made within one month. The court rejected the bank's demand for invoices while accommodating its fraud-prevention concerns through a balanced disclosure requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case