RAJDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/17065/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010514172026

Filing Number

CRM-M/22499/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/17065/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. BRIJESHWAR SINGH BHALLA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.HARWAIL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioners Rajdeep Singh and Harwail Singh, who were arrested for alleged NDPS violations, arms act violations, and assaulting police during a raid. The court found that while petitioner No. 2 had recovered contraband (10 grams of heroin, ammunition, and cash), the quantity was non-commercial, no serious injury occurred, and neither petitioner was required for further investigation. Consequently, continued pre-trial detention served no useful purpose and bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/17065/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioners Rajdeep Singh and Harwail Singh, who were arrested for alleged NDPS violations, arms act violations, and assaulting police during a raid. The court found that while petitioner No. 2 had recovered contraband (10 grams of heroin, ammunition, and cash), the quantity was non-commercial, no serious injury occurred, and neither petitioner was required for further investigation. Consequently, continued pre-trial detention served no useful purpose and bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case