SANDEEP YADAV ALIAS SULLI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/17226/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010513562026

Filing Number

CRM-M/22399/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/17226/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP YADAV ALIAS SULLI

    Adv. ARNAV GHAI

  2. 2.SANDEEP YADAV @ SULLI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SANDEEP YADAV @ SULLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/17226/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Sandeep Yadav (petitioner) in an assault case arising from FIR No. 426 dated 18.12.2025. The petitioner was accused of participating in a violent mob attack on Vikrant Yadav alongside multiple co-accused. The court allowed the bail petition, citing: (i) the petitioner's four-month-plus custody period; (ii) clean antecedents; (iii) weak evidence—only a co-accused's disclosure statement recorded in police custody with admissibility concerns; (iv) completed investigation requiring no further recovery; and (v) the constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21. Release conditions included furnishing bonds, not tampering with witnesses, maintaining address notification, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/17226/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/17226/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Sandeep Yadav (petitioner) in an assault case arising from FIR No. 426 dated 18.12.2025. The petitioner was accused of participating in a violent mob attack on Vikrant Yadav alongside multiple co-accused. The court allowed the bail petition, citing: (i) the petitioner's four-month-plus custody period; (ii) clean antecedents; (iii) weak evidence—only a co-accused's disclosure statement recorded in police custody with admissibility concerns; (iv) completed investigation requiring no further recovery; and (v) the constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21. Release conditions included furnishing bonds, not tampering with witnesses, maintaining address notification, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case