SUNITA RANI AND ORS. vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/20438/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306,506 IPC. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010513532023

Filing Number

CRM-M/30844/2023

Filing Date

20-Apr-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/20438/2023

Registration Date

21-Apr-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 306,506 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA RANI AND ORS.

    Adv. KARANJEET SINGH BRAR

  2. 2.JAGWINDER SINGH @ JASWINDER SINGH

  3. 3.GURMIT RAM

  4. 4.MEENU SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.SAJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Sunita Rani and others seeking to quash FIR No.194 (registered under Sections 306 and 506 IPC for abetment to suicide and criminal intimidation) based on a compromise agreement dated 24.02.2023. The court found the petition unmaintainable following the Division Bench's observations in Rakesh Das v. State of Haryana, holding that FIRs under Section 306 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise, and dismissed the petition due to the petitioners' failure to appear and provide relevant case law despite multiple adjournments since January 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20438/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Sunita Rani and others seeking to quash FIR No.194 (registered under Sections 306 and 506 IPC for abetment to suicide and criminal intimidation) based on a compromise agreement dated 24.02.2023. The court found the petition unmaintainable following the Division Bench's observations in Rakesh Das v. State of Haryana, holding that FIRs under Section 306 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise, and dismissed the petition due to the petitioners' failure to appear and provide relevant case law despite multiple adjournments since January 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case