KOMALDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/3427/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010507422026

Filing Number

CRWP/22171/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRWP/3427/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOMALDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. BHISHAM KINGER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.MANJIT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP-3427-2026 Komaldeep Kaur and Manjit Singh sought protective orders from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana after marrying on 23.03.2026 against their families' wishes, claiming threats to their life and liberty. Justice Sumeet Goel disposed of the petition without commenting on the marriage's legality, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali, to examine the petitioners' representation and pass appropriate orders within two weeks, while reserving liberty for private respondents to seek recall and preserving the State's right to take lawful action if the petitioners are involved in other cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/3427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP-3427-2026 Komaldeep Kaur and Manjit Singh sought protective orders from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana after marrying on 23.03.2026 against their families' wishes, claiming threats to their life and liberty. Justice Sumeet Goel disposed of the petition without commenting on the marriage's legality, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali, to examine the petitioners' representation and pass appropriate orders within two weeks, while reserving liberty for private respondents to seek recall and preserving the State's right to take lawful action if the petitioners are involved in other cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case