JAGDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/3411/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010504732026

Filing Number

CRWP/22005/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRWP/3411/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SUKHWINDER SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.SSP SRI MUKATSAR SAHIB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.SSP SRI MUKATSAR SAHIB

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer) KOTBHAI

  5. 5.DHARAMPAL SINGH

  6. 6.GURPYAR SINGH

  7. 7.LAKHVIR SINGH

  8. 8.KHUSHDEEP SINGH

  9. 9.JAGSIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, to assess threats to two major adults in a live-in relationship and take appropriate protective action in accordance with law. The court affirmed that the fundamental right to life and liberty must be protected regardless of marital status, and that such protection extends to guarding against threats from private parties or relatives, though clarified the order does not prevent legal action if the petitioners commit offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/3411/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, to assess threats to two major adults in a live-in relationship and take appropriate protective action in accordance with law. The court affirmed that the fundamental right to life and liberty must be protected regardless of marital status, and that such protection extends to guarding against threats from private parties or relatives, though clarified the order does not prevent legal action if the petitioners commit offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case