GAJENDER vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/16579/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010499532026

Filing Number

CRM-M/21706/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/16579/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJENDER

    Adv. DINESH MAURYA

  2. 2.GAJENDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/16579/2026 The High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Gajender in an NDPS Act case (FIR No. 44/2021) involving contraband drug seizure. The court found merit in the petition based on: prior bail grant on merits (December 2022), absence of incriminating evidence beyond co-accused disclosure statements, clean antecedents, custody since December 2024, and anticipated lengthy trial duration. Justice Subhas Mehla held that bail cannot be denied as punishment and is the rule rather than exception, ordering release upon furnishing requisite bonds to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/16579/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/16579/2026 The High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Gajender in an NDPS Act case (FIR No. 44/2021) involving contraband drug seizure. The court found merit in the petition based on: prior bail grant on merits (December 2022), absence of incriminating evidence beyond co-accused disclosure statements, clean antecedents, custody since December 2024, and anticipated lengthy trial duration. Justice Subhas Mehla held that bail cannot be denied as punishment and is the rule rather than exception, ordering release upon furnishing requisite bonds to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case