KAMAL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18488/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010499232026
Filing Number
CRM-M/21688/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/18488/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMAL SINGH
Adv. PUNIT VERMA
-
2.KAMAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.KAMAL SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Kamal Singh in an NDPS Act case involving poppy husk smuggling. The court found that while 30.22 kg poppy husk was recovered from the truck in which Singh was traveling (non-commercial quantity), he had already served over six months in custody, the investigation was complete, and continued detention served no purpose. Relying on Supreme Court precedents emphasizing bail as the rule and detention as exception, the court allowed the petition subject to standard bail conditions including furnishing bonds and not leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/18488/2026
Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Kamal Singh in an NDPS Act case involving poppy husk smuggling. The court found that while 30.22 kg poppy husk was recovered from the truck in which Singh was traveling (non-commercial quantity), he had already served over six months in custody, the investigation was complete, and continued detention served no purpose. Relying on Supreme Court precedents emphasizing bail as the rule and detention as exception, the court allowed the petition subject to standard bail conditions including furnishing bonds and not leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts