BHAG KAUR vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/9078/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010498842026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/17402/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/9078/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

263.12 - MISC. PUNJAB-MP/MLA ( 962 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAG KAUR

    Adv. SAURAV BHATIA

  2. 2.Bhag Kaur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Bhag Kaur

  3. 3.The Director General of Police

  4. 4.The Senior Superintendent of Police

  5. 5.Laljit Singh Bhullar

  6. 6.Sukhdev Singh Bhullar

  7. 7.Dilbag Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/9078/2026 The petition filed by Bhag Kaur (mother of deceased Gagandeep Singh Randhawa) seeking directions to conduct a post-mortem outside Punjab was disposed of after the State informed the court that the deceased's wife had already requested post-mortem at Amritsar under videography, which was in progress with full video documentation as electronic evidence. The petitioner's counsel acknowledged that the grievance stood redressed, leading the court to dispose of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9078/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/9078/2026 The petition filed by Bhag Kaur (mother of deceased Gagandeep Singh Randhawa) seeking directions to conduct a post-mortem outside Punjab was disposed of after the State informed the court that the deceased's wife had already requested post-mortem at Amritsar under videography, which was in progress with full video documentation as electronic evidence. The petitioner's counsel acknowledged that the grievance stood redressed, leading the court to dispose of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case