JALMO DEVI RANDEEP SINGH HARSH AGGARWAL vs OM PARKASH — FAO/4709/2004
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010491732004
Filing Number
FAO/4709/2004
Filing Date
27-Oct-2004
Registration No
FAO/4709/2004
Registration Date
27-Oct-2004
Judge
Lok Adalat Bench - 2
Coram
Lok Adalat Bench - 2
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.24 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 889 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JALMO DEVI RANDEEP SINGH HARSH AGGARWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.OM PARKASH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Lok Adalat Bench - 2View PDF
In FAO/4709/2004, the Punjab High Court allowed an appeal by Jalmo Devi (widow of Sunder) against Om Parkash, awarding her an additional Rs. 1,50,000 over the tribunal's original award in a settlement agreed by both parties. The insurance company (National Insurance Co. Ltd.) was directed to deposit the crossed-cheque by June 22, 2026, with 9% annual interest applicable if payment was delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2008
—
Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain , Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh
-
11-Jul-2005
—
Mr. Justice Mehtab S. Gill , Mr. Justice Satish Kumar Mittal
-
12-Mar-2005
—
Mrs. Justice Nirmal Yadav , Mr. Justice Jitendra Vir Gupta
-
03-Mar-2005
—
Mrs. Justice Nirmal Yadav , Mr. Justice Jitendra Vir Gupta
-
31-Jan-2005
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2004
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/4709/2004
In FAO/4709/2004, the Punjab High Court allowed an appeal by Jalmo Devi (widow of Sunder) against Om Parkash, awarding her an additional Rs. 1,50,000 over the tribunal's original award in a settlement agreed by both parties. The insurance company (National Insurance Co. Ltd.) was directed to deposit the crossed-cheque by June 22, 2026, with 9% annual interest applicable if payment was delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts