JASWANT & ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRR/1578/2008

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Aug-2008

CNR: PHHC010490602008

Filing Number

CRR/1578/2008

Filing Date

21-Aug-2008

Registration No

CRR/1578/2008

Registration Date

21-Aug-2008

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.35 - CRL REV AGNST CONV (GENERAL ONE YEAR) ( 617 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASWANT & ORS

    Adv. RAMENDER CHAUHAN

  2. 2.Jaswant

  3. 3.Deshraj

  4. 4.Ranbir

  5. 5.Satbir

  6. 6.Ram Kumar

  7. 7.Sarjit

  8. 8.Sahi Ram

  9. 9.Mahabir @ Rajender Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    Summary of CRR 1578/2008 The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the convictions of petitioners Jaswant and others for offences under IPC Sections 148, 323, 324, 325 read with Section 149, arising from a violent confrontation over laying a water pipeline in 1997. However, the court reduced their sentences to the period already undergone (2 months 12 days) considering they faced 29 years of prosecution and 17 years on bail without misuse, while maintaining the original fine amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Oct-2008

    —

    Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal

  4. 22-Aug-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1578/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRR 1578/2008 The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the convictions of petitioners Jaswant and others for offences under IPC Sections 148, 323, 324, 325 read with Section 149, arising from a violent confrontation over laying a water pipeline in 1997. However, the court reduced their sentences to the period already undergone (2 months 12 days) considering they faced 29 years of prosecution and 17 years on bail without misuse, while maintaining the original fine amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case