RAVI KUMAR vs PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST GURUGRAM AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/17210/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010488752026

Filing Number

CRM-M/21147/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/17210/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR

    Adv. P S JAMMU

  2. 2.RAVI KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST GURUGRAM AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.RAVI KUMAR

  3. 3.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ravi Kumar, who was accused of filing fake GST returns, generating fraudulent bills, and forging documents for tax evasion involving Rs. 66 crores. The court found that while the allegations were serious, Kumar had already served six months of his potential five-year sentence, the offense was magistrate-triable, and he did not directly benefit from the embezzlement, making continued detention unjustified under the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/17210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ravi Kumar, who was accused of filing fake GST returns, generating fraudulent bills, and forging documents for tax evasion involving Rs. 66 crores. The court found that while the allegations were serious, Kumar had already served six months of his potential five-year sentence, the offense was magistrate-triable, and he did not directly benefit from the embezzlement, making continued detention unjustified under the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case