BALJINDER KAUR LEHRA vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS — CWP/8899/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010487342026

e-Filing Number

20-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/17009/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8899/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALJINDER KAUR LEHRA

    Adv. Ashish Pal Kaushal

  2. 2.Reserve Bank of India through its Authorized officer and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Reserve Bank of India through its Authorized officer and others

  3. 3.Ombudsman RBI Banking,

  4. 4.State Bank of India, Branch Dana Mandi,

  5. 5.Punjab and Sind Bank, Dana Mandi,

  6. 6.Kuldeep Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/8899/2026 Baljinder Kaur Lehra, an NRI residing in the USA, sought court intervention to operate her deceased husband's and mother-in-law's bank accounts held with State Bank of India and Punjab and Sind Bank, which the banks refused despite her authorization. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the RBI Ombudsman to examine her representation and pass an appropriate order within two weeks, disposing of the petition based on her limited prayer without requiring respondents' response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/8899/2026 Baljinder Kaur Lehra, an NRI residing in the USA, sought court intervention to operate her deceased husband's and mother-in-law's bank accounts held with State Bank of India and Punjab and Sind Bank, which the banks refused despite her authorization. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the RBI Ombudsman to examine her representation and pass an appropriate order within two weeks, disposing of the petition based on her limited prayer without requiring respondents' response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case