GURDASPUR COOP.SUGAR MILLS VINOD SHARMA vs GHAN SHAM SINGH ETC. — RFA/4039/2001

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010486212001

Filing Number

RFA/4039/2001

Filing Date

11-Oct-2001

Registration No

RFA/4039/2001

Registration Date

11-Oct-2001

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

25.3 - RFA (LAND ACQUISITION) PUNJAB ( 493 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL-I(RFA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURDASPUR COOP.SUGAR MILLS VINOD SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHAN SHAM SINGH ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Summary of RFA 4039/2001 The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld enhanced land compensation for landowners whose 19.65 acres in village Paniar were acquired for an alcohol treatment facility. The court rejected the Sugar Mill's appeal (lacking evidence to rebut landowners' claims) and partly allowed the landowners' appeals, awarding uniform compensation at Rs.1,60,000 per acre (calculated from pre-notification sale deeds with 8% annual appreciation), plus statutory benefits, solatium, and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Oct-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. RFA/4039/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RFA 4039/2001 The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld enhanced land compensation for landowners whose 19.65 acres in village Paniar were acquired for an alcohol treatment facility. The court rejected the Sugar Mill's appeal (lacking evidence to rebut landowners' claims) and partly allowed the landowners' appeals, awarding uniform compensation at Rs.1,60,000 per acre (calculated from pre-notification sale deeds with 8% annual appreciation), plus statutory benefits, solatium, and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case