VEENA SOBTI DECEASED THROUGH LR vs HARVINOD SINGH WALIA — CR/2679/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010485352026

Filing Number

CR/16961/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CR/2679/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.54 - CR FILED BY TENANT AGNST FO/JUDG IN RENT ACT PB. ( 531 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VEENA SOBTI DECEASED THROUGH LR

    Adv. V.K.SANDHIR

  2. 2.HARVINOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARVINOD SINGH WALIA

  2. 2.HARVINOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed revision petitions filed by shop tenants (Veena Sobti, Sucha Singh, and Dr. Pawan Kumar) challenging eviction orders for non-payment of rent. The Court upheld the lower authorities' findings that the respondent landlord validly acquired ownership through a sale deed dated 20.09.2013 and established a clear landlord-tenant relationship, rejecting tenants' claims of clouded title. The Court confirmed rent arrears at Rs.100/month from September 1993 onward, finding no illegality in the concurrent factual findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/2679/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed revision petitions filed by shop tenants (Veena Sobti, Sucha Singh, and Dr. Pawan Kumar) challenging eviction orders for non-payment of rent. The Court upheld the lower authorities' findings that the respondent landlord validly acquired ownership through a sale deed dated 20.09.2013 and established a clear landlord-tenant relationship, rejecting tenants' claims of clouded title. The Court confirmed rent arrears at Rs.100/month from September 1993 onward, finding no illegality in the concurrent factual findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case