MANOJ KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/8960/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010483772026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16882/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8960/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.2 - GOVT SERVICE (PB) PENSION/RETIRAL BENEFIT ( 778 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR

    Adv. PEEUSH GAGNEJA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT OFFICER

  5. 5.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT OFFICER

  6. 6.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    The High Court disposed of Manoj Kumar's petition seeking release of pending service-cum-retirement dues including gratuity, pension, and DA arrears from January 2016. The court directed the State of Punjab (Respondent No.2) to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 12.01.2026 expeditiously within three months by passing a speaking order after affording him a hearing, without adjudicating the merits at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8960/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of Manoj Kumar's petition seeking release of pending service-cum-retirement dues including gratuity, pension, and DA arrears from January 2016. The court directed the State of Punjab (Respondent No.2) to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 12.01.2026 expeditiously within three months by passing a speaking order after affording him a hearing, without adjudicating the merits at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case