SHALU AND OTHERS vs UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER — CWP/8938/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010483642026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16875/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8938/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Category

94.1 - GOVT. SERVICE U.T. ( 822 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHALU AND OTHERS

    Adv. ANKUR MALIK

  2. 2.UT Chandigarh and another

  3. 3.Health and Family Welfare, Government Multi Specialty

  4. 4.Ramesh Kumar

  5. 5.Gurpal Sharma

  6. 6.Radhika Sharma

  7. 7.Alka Murmu

  8. 8.Jasbir

  9. 9.Krishan

  10. 10.Raj Bala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.UT Chandigarh and another

  3. 3.Health and Family Welfare, Government Multi Specialty

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/8938/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by outsourced employees (Sweepers/Security Guards/MTS staff) challenging their termination from Government Multi-Specialty Hospital, Chandigarh. The court held that writ petitions are not maintainable against private contractors/outsourcing agencies, as the petitioners were employees of the contractor, not the government. The court directed petitioners to pursue alternate remedies available under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8938/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/8938/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by outsourced employees (Sweepers/Security Guards/MTS staff) challenging their termination from Government Multi-Specialty Hospital, Chandigarh. The court held that writ petitions are not maintainable against private contractors/outsourcing agencies, as the petitioners were employees of the contractor, not the government. The court directed petitioners to pursue alternate remedies available under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case