MS PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CWP/8866/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010482282026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16842/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8866/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Category

6.34 - WRIT PETITION EXCISE & CUSTOMS PB (INDIRECT) ( 385 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED

    Adv. ARUSHI DUBEY

  2. 2.MS PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.MS PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED

  3. 3.Excise Commissioner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal,ms. Justice Lapita BanerjiView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Piccadily Agro Industries Limited's writ petition by directing the Excise Commissioner to decide the petitioner's representation dated 05.03.2026 within 30 days through a speaking order after affording all parties an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the Excise Commissioner's decision in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8866/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Piccadily Agro Industries Limited's writ petition by directing the Excise Commissioner to decide the petitioner's representation dated 05.03.2026 within 30 days through a speaking order after affording all parties an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the Excise Commissioner's decision in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case