HARPREET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/19169/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,325,323,506,148,149,188,269 IPC. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010480322023

Filing Number

CRM-M/28872/2023

Filing Date

13-Apr-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/19169/2023

Registration Date

18-Apr-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

48.2 - CRIMINAL TRANSFER (DJ/ADJ/SJ/ASJ) ( 154 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,325,323,506,148,149,188,269 IPC
Arms Act Section 25,27,54,59 ARMS
Disaster Management Act Section 51B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARPREET SINGH

    Adv. JOGINDER PAL DEVGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.YADWINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Harpreet Singh's petition seeking transfer of criminal trials to another judge, finding the petition infructuous since the trial had already concluded with acquittals on 19.04.2023. The court noted that despite issuing an interim order directing the trial court not to pass a final order, the accused were acquitted, and directed the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies if desired, expressing no opinion on whether the trial court was aware of the interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/19169/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Harpreet Singh's petition seeking transfer of criminal trials to another judge, finding the petition infructuous since the trial had already concluded with acquittals on 19.04.2023. The court noted that despite issuing an interim order directing the trial court not to pass a final order, the accused were acquitted, and directed the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies if desired, expressing no opinion on whether the trial court was aware of the interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case